Understand what your API contract supports
for autonomous use.
ARCVERIN analyzes an OpenAPI contract and reports the evidence it contains, the gaps that remain, and proposed next steps for agent and MCP designs.
Static findings describe the supplied contract. They do not verify deployed authorization or runtime behavior.
From contract structure to readiness evidence.
OpenAPI validation and readiness qualification answer different questions. ARCVERIN examines declared operation details and reports what the supplied evidence supports, leaves open, or suggests reviewing.
OpenAPI is the evidence source—not the conclusion.
The contract already describes operations, data boundaries, security schemes, errors, callbacks, references, and workflow clues. ARCVERIN resolves those signals into a readiness model and keeps uncertainty explicit.
Reconstruct
Resolve operations, schemas, references, callbacks, links, authentication, and dependencies.
Qualify
Apply deterministic rules for meaning, authority, effects, verification, retry, recovery, and exposure.
Bound confidence
Distinguish proven contract facts from conservative derivation, owner policy, missing evidence, and analyzer limits.
Decide
Show what is ready, what stays restricted, and the exact change or evidence needed for reassessment.
Hold the evaluator constant. Compare locked evidence surfaces.
ARCVERIN applies the same qualification release, rule set, and evidence boundary to each locked OpenAPI surface. That makes differences explainable: the evaluator stays fixed while the declared contract evidence changes.
One qualification basis
Use the same release, rules, and interpretation boundary for every surface in the comparison.
One exact contract at a time
Each result belongs to a specific, unchanged OpenAPI surface. A changed surface becomes a new comparison point.
Explain what changed
Compare rule outcomes and evidence gaps without importing assumptions from outside the evaluated contracts.
This is not a provider ranking. The comparison does not use customer history, provider reputation, or a hosted backend, and it does not claim runtime proof. It compares declared OpenAPI evidence under a controlled qualification basis.
A decision teams can defend and act on.
Operation-level outcomes
See emitted findings and coverage status for analyzed operations, including unresolved or unsupported areas.
Exposure recommendations
Identify safeguards and restrictions to consider before exposing tools. Arcverin reports recommendations; enforcement belongs in your configured MCP server, gateway, or application.
Remediation guidance
Review suggested owner roles, evidence or source changes, and reassessment conditions where the analysis can determine them.
Evidence lineage
Traceable locations, identities, causes, confidence, and decision provenance for assurance review.
Workflow insight
Candidate verification, recovery, callback, and dependency relationships reconstructed from the contract.
Shareable reports
Technical and executive views that put API, platform, security, and AI teams on the same evidence.
Bring evidence into your agent-readiness decisions.
ARCVERIN analyzes declared operations, schemas, security requirements, and workflow links. Its reports describe what the supplied contract supports, where evidence is missing, and what a team could review or change next.
Describe each action
Review operation inputs, outputs, security declarations, effects, and remaining contract evidence gaps.
Connect operations
Inspect workflow and dependency candidates, input bindings, and unresolved sequence assumptions.
Plan toward a goal
Review source-supported intent and proposed workflow steps while keeping unknown goals and success checks visible.
Levels 1–3 describe static design analysis. Drafts and Arazzo validation do not show that a workflow ran or achieved its goal. Confirm owner intent and authorization separately, and verify runtime outcomes with execution evidence.
For API and platform teams
Prioritize contract improvements and understand operation-level effects before exposing tools to agent clients.
For security and governance teams
Trace findings to source evidence, distinguish documented facts from open evidence needs, and make exposure decisions explicit.
For agent and MCP builders
Use qualification results to shape safer tool surfaces and iterate on a mock or revised OpenAPI contract.
Download ARCVERIN 0.7.10
Download the archive for your platform and compare its SHA-256 with the checksum file before extraction. Extract into a writable folder, then open a terminal in the extracted application folder.
Windows PowerShell: .\arcverin.exe studio serve
Ubuntu 26.04: ./arcverin studio serve
Open the local URL printed by Studio. The development entitlement is bundled and expires at the end of December 31, 2026 (US Eastern time). Native tools need no Python, Node.js, or Visual Studio installation. Provider specifications and credentials are not bundled; start with your own OpenAPI contract.
Questions about ARCVERIN? Email info@arcverin.com or call +1 (508) 614-9976.
The website does not accept OpenAPI uploads. Qualification and workflow planning analyze files locally; they do not test deployed API behavior.
What ARCVERIN refuses to guess matters as much as what it finds.
Contract facts can establish declared structure, constraints, and relationships.
Conservative derivation can identify candidates without turning inference into proof.
Proposed or inferred content receives no authoritative readiness credit.
Runtime behavior—such as approval enforcement, audit retrieval, retry behavior, or sandbox parity—remains unverified without qualifying evidence.
See what your OpenAPI contract can—and cannot—prove.
The release section shows current package availability. The development build evaluates an OpenAPI specification locally and reports evidence gaps, design recommendations, and unresolved questions.
- ✓ Operation-level readiness outcomes
- ✓ Exposure and evidence gaps
- ✓ Prioritized remediation path